Posts
Fuck no. I've totally changed my mind on having nothing to write about, because I just visited Jack Chick's website. And on this website was a wonderful little pile of excrement called "Is Allah Like You?". Needless to say, Jack's writing about Muslims here and thus needless to say, it's a wild ride of wife-beatings and heavily-implicit racism. However, it is also surprisingly well versed (HA) in Qur'anic verses.
Since my favourite Chick-critic Jabberwock is busy reorganising his site and thus hasn't recently done any of his vaunted Chick Dissections, I thought I might give one a whirl. The main problem here is that J is funny and I am not, but I think you'll find that Chick's works are hilarious by themselves.
So prepare thyselves for "Is Allah Like You?"
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Procrastination (from the other side)
Case in point - having written the French essay I've now not posted anything here in days. I'm even stymied for something to write now. Hmmm.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Procrastination
You know, it really is amazing what a motivated blogger one can be when one is staring down the barrel of a French culture essay:
Me: "Be cool, man! You're only 800 words and about French popular music!"
Essay: [in a Southern drawl that is inexplicably also French sounding] [Cajun?] "Shut it you varmint - git back to blogging"
I'm simply worried that we've all got off on the wrong foot - me with my hit-the-ground-running criticisms of religion, you the reader with your absence of readership. So here are some happy pictures to make us all feel good:
Hey cmon, man. We're trying to move away from all that name-calling. How about something a little friendlier?
That's better. Heh heh, this one never gets old - it's like a philosophy major in 500x625 format.
And this one, too. More of a psychology major, I guess, since it forces you to examine what the FUCK possessed Disney to come up with someone like this.
Hey man, easy. We're moving away from all this stupidity and..by God, that really is a facepalm. My soul hurts.
That would explain it. Let's move onto something that we can all agree on...
Perfect!
Me: "Be cool, man! You're only 800 words and about French popular music!"
Essay: [in a Southern drawl that is inexplicably also French sounding] [Cajun?] "Shut it you varmint - git back to blogging"
I'm simply worried that we've all got off on the wrong foot - me with my hit-the-ground-running criticisms of religion, you the reader with your absence of readership. So here are some happy pictures to make us all feel good:
Hey cmon, man. We're trying to move away from all that name-calling. How about something a little friendlier?
That's better. Heh heh, this one never gets old - it's like a philosophy major in 500x625 format.
And this one, too. More of a psychology major, I guess, since it forces you to examine what the FUCK possessed Disney to come up with someone like this.
Hey man, easy. We're moving away from all this stupidity and..by God, that really is a facepalm. My soul hurts.
That would explain it. Let's move onto something that we can all agree on...
Perfect!
And now for an explanation.
Thought it might be worth explaining why my URL has the word "fasiq" in it, and what that weird squiggly thing at the top of the page is (it's the Arabic for "fasiq").
Fasiq: One who is disobedient or rebellious to God.
C'est moi! I've read other definitions that describe it as "one who knowingly and flagrantly disobeys God's laws" and the modern Arabic translation is "punk". Hmm - am I cool enough to be a punk? Let's stick with the first two definitions.
Also, please don't get the impression that I have some vendetta against Islam or Muslims (despite the fact that I use their word for agnostic and my very first post was defending the mass offending of Muslims worldwide) - I have a beef with religion and religious totalitarianism, and it must be said that there are currently many more prevalent examples of Islamic totalitarianism to be incensed by.
However, the whole Christian fundie movement (especially in America, but I have to be careful not to insult the American guy in my Politics tutorial) is capable of really really infuriating me too - Fundies Say the Darndest Things is a masochistic ritual I engage in regularly to remind me why people shouldn't be allowed to inflict their opinions on other people. Seriously, fuck them (par exemple).
Fasiq: One who is disobedient or rebellious to God.
C'est moi! I've read other definitions that describe it as "one who knowingly and flagrantly disobeys God's laws" and the modern Arabic translation is "punk". Hmm - am I cool enough to be a punk? Let's stick with the first two definitions.
Also, please don't get the impression that I have some vendetta against Islam or Muslims (despite the fact that I use their word for agnostic and my very first post was defending the mass offending of Muslims worldwide) - I have a beef with religion and religious totalitarianism, and it must be said that there are currently many more prevalent examples of Islamic totalitarianism to be incensed by.
However, the whole Christian fundie movement (especially in America, but I have to be careful not to insult the American guy in my Politics tutorial) is capable of really really infuriating me too - Fundies Say the Darndest Things is a masochistic ritual I engage in regularly to remind me why people shouldn't be allowed to inflict their opinions on other people. Seriously, fuck them (par exemple).
Just to get the ball rolling...
As a first post, I thought I'd recycle some old opinions of mine. This is what I had to say on Facebook in response to criticism against Everybody Draw Mohammed Day.
People will always be offended by something; it is inevitable. Take the depiction of sexual activity (whether it's actual porn or just a sex scene in a movie) - here is something that will offend MANY people due primarily to their religious beliefs. Should we thus remove any depiction of, or even reference to, sexual activity from society just to appease these people's puritanical sensibilities? Is morality, or even just societal ethics, to be dictated by the most-offended person? So a Muslim might be (again, *might* be) offended by my depiction of Mohammed. I am offended (and I genuinely am) by the implication that as a result, I may not depict Mohammed. Why does their offense trump mine?
All this arguing is moot, however, since that is NOT the point of Everybody Draw Mohammed Day. The point is not to say "hey everyone, let's take advantage of our right to free speech by deliberately insulting a certain faith". You want to read that again?? That is NOT the point. Everybody Draw Mohammed Day exists because certain extremists believe that they can threaten and coerce us into following their dogmatic view of the world. It exists as a means of saying "we are not scared of your threats, and will not let fear prevent our right to free speech". This all came about due to the controversy of South Park's episodes 200 and 201.
There is a large backstory to this controversy. Early in the show, in the episode Super Best Friends, Mohammed is part of a team of super heroes made up of the prophets from various major faiths (in which case, surely it would be offensive NOT to portray him?). Anyway, no one cared or thought South Park had done anything offensive (plus he had the power of fire.. bitchin). This was, however, before the Jyllands-Posten controversy which I freely and vehemently state was a deliberate and racist attempt to provoke the reaction it did, in order to create backlash against the Muslim community. The reaction, however, caused a swell of fear throughout the Western world and it became taboo to portray Mohammed (purely out of fear - effective terrorism much?). When South Park again tried to portray Mohammed in Cartoon Wars Part 1 and 2, they were censored by Comedy Central, despite the fact that the episodes were about standing up against fear and coercion while AT THE SAME TIME saying that we shouldn't offend people's sensibilities just because we can. This was a repeated but much more focused theme of episodes 200 and 201. In response to the implicit (but never explicit) depiction of Mohammed in 200, both the show's creators and Comedy Central received death threats (and there was recent speculation - not sure how accurate - that the Times Square bomb scare was targeting Comedy Central). As a result, even mentioning the name Mohammed was censored from 201 and Kyle's final speech (even though it didn't mention Mohammed once) was bleeped out. Due not to the "offense" of the Muslim community (were they offended?) but instead to the violent and extremist fundamentalists who believe that anyone who doesn't agree with them must die (that truly is the sensibility of Qutbist extremists).
To summarise: I will not refrain from acting simply out of the fear that it will offend someone. Invariably I will and it is counterproductive to both society and human experience to worry about doing so. That said, there is little justification in acting simply to be offensive - it serves only to harm and displays a worrying sadistic streak. Everybody Draw Mohammed Day, while it may offend some Muslims (though I think to claim they'll all be offended is a little maternalistic and patronising) is about standing up to those who threaten us with violence on account of dogmatic religious beliefs which we do not share. THAT is why I will be drawing Mohammed on May 20.
As it happened, I didn't draw Mohammed on May 20. I got utterly sick and tired of all the bickering and unpleasantness that it evoked that I sat it out. In fact, my post on Facebook, with words to that (but more profane) effect, was what made me think I should get a blog. You live and learn.
People will always be offended by something; it is inevitable. Take the depiction of sexual activity (whether it's actual porn or just a sex scene in a movie) - here is something that will offend MANY people due primarily to their religious beliefs. Should we thus remove any depiction of, or even reference to, sexual activity from society just to appease these people's puritanical sensibilities? Is morality, or even just societal ethics, to be dictated by the most-offended person? So a Muslim might be (again, *might* be) offended by my depiction of Mohammed. I am offended (and I genuinely am) by the implication that as a result, I may not depict Mohammed. Why does their offense trump mine?
All this arguing is moot, however, since that is NOT the point of Everybody Draw Mohammed Day. The point is not to say "hey everyone, let's take advantage of our right to free speech by deliberately insulting a certain faith". You want to read that again?? That is NOT the point. Everybody Draw Mohammed Day exists because certain extremists believe that they can threaten and coerce us into following their dogmatic view of the world. It exists as a means of saying "we are not scared of your threats, and will not let fear prevent our right to free speech". This all came about due to the controversy of South Park's episodes 200 and 201.
There is a large backstory to this controversy. Early in the show, in the episode Super Best Friends, Mohammed is part of a team of super heroes made up of the prophets from various major faiths (in which case, surely it would be offensive NOT to portray him?). Anyway, no one cared or thought South Park had done anything offensive (plus he had the power of fire.. bitchin). This was, however, before the Jyllands-Posten controversy which I freely and vehemently state was a deliberate and racist attempt to provoke the reaction it did, in order to create backlash against the Muslim community. The reaction, however, caused a swell of fear throughout the Western world and it became taboo to portray Mohammed (purely out of fear - effective terrorism much?). When South Park again tried to portray Mohammed in Cartoon Wars Part 1 and 2, they were censored by Comedy Central, despite the fact that the episodes were about standing up against fear and coercion while AT THE SAME TIME saying that we shouldn't offend people's sensibilities just because we can. This was a repeated but much more focused theme of episodes 200 and 201. In response to the implicit (but never explicit) depiction of Mohammed in 200, both the show's creators and Comedy Central received death threats (and there was recent speculation - not sure how accurate - that the Times Square bomb scare was targeting Comedy Central). As a result, even mentioning the name Mohammed was censored from 201 and Kyle's final speech (even though it didn't mention Mohammed once) was bleeped out. Due not to the "offense" of the Muslim community (were they offended?) but instead to the violent and extremist fundamentalists who believe that anyone who doesn't agree with them must die (that truly is the sensibility of Qutbist extremists).
To summarise: I will not refrain from acting simply out of the fear that it will offend someone. Invariably I will and it is counterproductive to both society and human experience to worry about doing so. That said, there is little justification in acting simply to be offensive - it serves only to harm and displays a worrying sadistic streak. Everybody Draw Mohammed Day, while it may offend some Muslims (though I think to claim they'll all be offended is a little maternalistic and patronising) is about standing up to those who threaten us with violence on account of dogmatic religious beliefs which we do not share. THAT is why I will be drawing Mohammed on May 20.
As it happened, I didn't draw Mohammed on May 20. I got utterly sick and tired of all the bickering and unpleasantness that it evoked that I sat it out. In fact, my post on Facebook, with words to that (but more profane) effect, was what made me think I should get a blog. You live and learn.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)